FAIR reviews ontology
type: Ontology
imports: datacite
creator: idafensp
creator: mpoveda
publisher: www.oeg-upm.net
created: 2017-09-01
issued: 2017-11-07
modified: 2017-11-03
preferred namespace prefix: fr
comment: This vocabulary represents scientific reviews. This model is used to annotate http://fairreviews.linkeddata.es/ data.
version info: 0.1.0
type: NamedIndividual
license: cc-by4.0

has rating
type: ObjectProperty
domain: Review
range: Rating concept
comment: The relation between a review and a given rating assigned by a reviewer.

has review
type: ObjectProperty
inverse of: is review of
type: InverseFunctionalProperty
domain: Expression
range: Review
comment: Relation between a scientific contribution and the reviews issued for it.

has reviewer confidence
type: ObjectProperty
domain: Review
range: Confidence concept
comment: Relation between a review the confidence set by the author about the review topic. As the review can be written only by one author the confidence is assumed to be for such author about the given paper without need of creating a new class involving the three actors in a n-ary alike solution.

The relation between a review and agents that have contributed to the overall review as sub-reviwers.
type: ObjectProperty
domain: Review
range: Agent
label: has sub-reviewer

is reply to
type: ObjectProperty
domain: Endeavour
range: Endeavour
comment: The relation between a given endeavour and the endeavour that it is replying to. For example, the relation between a reply and a given review.

is review of
type: ObjectProperty
type: FunctionalProperty
domain: Review
range: Expression
comment: The relation between a review and the scientific contribution that is subject of the review.

issued at
type: ObjectProperty
domain: Review
range: Tracking system
comment: The relation between a review and the tracking or scholarly venue management system where the reviewing process took place.

issued for
type: ObjectProperty
domain: Review
range: Convening organization
comment: The realation between a review and the entity (e.g. conference, journal) that it was issued for (usually the one that requested the review).

released by
type: ObjectProperty
domain: Review
range: Agent
comment: The relation between the review and the agent publishing it. It might be the the author of the review or conference or journal to which the scientific resource was submitted to.

confidence value
type: DatatypeProperty
domain: Confidence concept
range: Literal
comment: Confidence value of expertise in the review topic given by the reviwer

content
type: DatatypeProperty
domain: Work
range: Literal
comment: Content of the review.

rating value
type: DatatypeProperty
domain: Rating concept
range: Literal
comment: Numerical value of the rating given to a review.

Language
type: Class
comment: Language of the scientific contribution (paper, review, etc.).

identificador
type: Class
comment: Un identificador que identifica de forma única a una entidad - tal como una agencia de financiación, una persona y un recurso - que pertenece a un esquema particular, como los especificados por individuos de la clase datacite:IdentifierScheme. @es

Policy
type: Class
comment: A non-empty group of Permissions and/or Prohibitions.

Confidence concept
type: Class
subclass of: Concept
comment: The set of values of a given confidence scale.

Confidence concept scheme
type: Class
subclass of: ConceptScheme
comment: A scale defining the confidence of a reviewer for a given topic.

Convening organization
type: Class
subclass of: Agent
comment: A venue (e.g. conference, workshop), a expression collection (e.g. journal, special issue), or an individual agent (e.g. organization, researcher) collecting scientific contributions.

Discrete confidence concept scheme
type: Class
subclass of: Confidence concept scheme
comment: A discrete scale defining the confidence of a reviewer for a given topic.

Discrete rating concept scheme
type: Class
subclass of: Rating concept scheme
comment: A discrete scale defining the rating given by a reviewer for a specific scientific contribution.

Rating concept
type: Class
subclass of: Concept
comment: The set of values of a given rating scale.

Rating concept scheme
type: Class
subclass of: ConceptScheme
comment: A scale defining the rating given by a reviewer for a specific scientific contribution.

Reply
type: Class
subclass of: Reply
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: creator
  some values from: Agent
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: language
  some values from: Language
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: issued
  some values from: date
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: modified
  some values from: date
comment: A reply to a review or another endeavour.

Review
type: Class
subclass of: Review
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: creator
  some values from: Agent
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: language
  some values from: Language
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: license
  some values from: Policy
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: is review of
  max qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: Expression
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: issued
  some values from: date
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: modified
  some values from: date
comment: A review of a scientific contribution.

Tracking system
type: Class
subclass of: ScholarlyVenueManagementSystem
comment: The platform where the review process takes place.

Approved to Not Approved
type: NamedIndividual
type: Discrete rating concept scheme
definition: Discrete scale from Approved to Not Approved, including Aprproved With Reservations,

Approved
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Approved to Not Approved
definition: Approved

Approved with reservations
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Approved to Not Approved
definition: Approved with reservations

Not approved
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Approved to Not Approved
definition: Not approved

Accept to Reject, Two Strikes
type: NamedIndividual
type: Discrete rating concept scheme
definition: Discrete scale from Accept to Reject, including pre-screening and two strikes rule

Accept
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Accept to Reject, Two Strikes
definition: Accept

Major revision
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Accept to Reject, Two Strikes
definition: Major revision

Minor revision
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Accept to Reject, Two Strikes
definition: Minor revision

Reject
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Accept to Reject, Two Strikes
definition: Reject

Reject (Pre-Screening)
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Accept to Reject, Two Strikes
definition: Reject (Pre-Screening)

Reject (Two Strikes)
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Accept to Reject, Two Strikes
definition: Reject (Two Strikes)

Discrete 1 to 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Discrete confidence concept scheme
definition: Discrete scale from 1 to 5, used by Association for Computational Linguistics annual meetings

1 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Discrete 1 to 5
confidence value: 1
definition: Not reviewer's area of expertise, or paper is very hard to understand. The evaluation is just an educated guess.

2 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Discrete 1 to 5
confidence value: 2
definition: Reviewers is willing to defend my evaluation, but it is fairly likely that he/she missed some details, didn't understand some central points, or can't be sure about the novelty of the work.

3 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Discrete 1 to 5
confidence value: 3
definition: Reviewer is pretty sure, but there's a chance he/she missed something. Although she/he has a good feel for this area in general, she/he did not carefully check the paper's details, e.g., the math, experimental design, or novelty.

4 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Discrete 1 to 5
confidence value: 4
definition: Reviewer is quite sure, tried to check the important points carefully. It's unlikely, though conceivable, that he/she missed something that should affect his/her ratings.

5 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Discrete 1 to 5
confidence value: 5
definition: Reviewer is positive that the evaluation is correct, has read the paper very carefully and is familiar with related work.

Discrete 0 to 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Discrete rating concept scheme
definition: Discrete scale from 0 to 10

0 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 0
definition: 0 out of 10

1 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 1
definition: 1 out of 10

10 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 10
definition: 10 out of 10

2 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 2
definition: 2 out of 10

3 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 3
definition: 3 out of 10

4 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 4
definition: 4 out of 10

5 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 5
definition: 5 out of 10

6 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 6
definition: 6 out of 10

7 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 7
definition: 7 out of 10

8 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 8
definition: 8 out of 10

9 out of 10
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 10
rating value: 9
definition: 9 out of 10

Discrete 0 to 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Discrete rating concept scheme
definition: Discrete scale from 0 to 5

0 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 5
rating value: 0
definition: 0 out of 5

1 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 5
rating value: 1
definition: 1 out of 5

2 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 5
rating value: 2
definition: 2 out of 5

3 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 5
rating value: 3
definition: 3 out of 5

4 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 5
rating value: 4
definition: 4 out of 5

5 out of 5
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete 0 to 5
rating value: 5
definition: 5 out of 5

Discrete -2 to 2
type: NamedIndividual
type: Discrete rating concept scheme
definition: Discrete scale from -2 to 2, including 0

0 on a [-2,2] scale
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete -2 to 2
rating value: 0
definition: 0 on a [-2,2] scale

-1 on a [-2,2] scale
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete -2 to 2
rating value: -1
definition: -1 on a [-2,2] scale

-2 on a [-2,2] scale
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete -2 to 2
rating value: -2
definition: -2 on a [-2,2] scale

1 on a [-2,2] scale
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete -2 to 2
rating value: 1
definition: 1 on a [-2,2] scale

2 on a [-2,2] scale
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: Discrete -2 to 2
rating value: 2
definition: 2 on a [-2,2] scale

Expert to Null
type: NamedIndividual
type: Discrete confidence concept scheme
definition: Discrete scale from Expert to Null, also representend in an scale from 4 to 0

Expert
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Expert to Null
confidence value: 4
definition: Expert

High
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Expert to Null
confidence value: 3
definition: High

Low
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Expert to Null
confidence value: 1
definition: Low

Medium
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Expert to Null
confidence value: 2
definition: Medium

Null
type: NamedIndividual
type: Confidence concept
in scheme: Expert to Null
confidence value: 0
definition: Null

St. Reject to St. Accept
type: NamedIndividual
type: Discrete rating concept scheme
definition: Discrete scale from Strong Reject to Strong Accept, including Bordeline

Accept
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept
definition: Accept

Borderline
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept
definition: Borderline

Reject
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept
definition: Reject

Strong Accept
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept
definition: Strong Accept

Strong Reject
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept
definition: Strong Reject

Weak Accept
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept
definition: Weak Accept

Weak Reject
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept
definition: Weak Reject

St. Reject to St. Accept, without Borderline
type: NamedIndividual
type: Discrete rating concept scheme
definition: Discrete scale from Strong Reject to Strong Accept, excluding Bordeline

Accept
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept, without Borderline
definition: Accept

Reject
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept, without Borderline
definition: Reject

Strong Accept
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept, without Borderline
definition: Strong Accept

Strong Reject
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept, without Borderline
definition: Strong Reject

Weak Accept
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept, without Borderline
definition: Weak Accept

Weak Reject
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept
in scheme: St. Reject to St. Accept, without Borderline
definition: Weak Reject

0 to 10 continuos
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept scheme

0 to 15 continuos
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept scheme

0 to 5 continuos
type: NamedIndividual
type: Rating concept scheme